Mavis Hee Makes Comeback After 20-Year Hiatus
Singaporean singer Mavis Hee, known for her hit songs like “Moonlight in the City,” returned to the stage in 2023 after a 20-year absence. However, her recent concert in Nanjing, China, on April 20th, has sparked controversy among fans.
Fans Upset Over Expensive Tickets and Lack of Hit Songs
Following the concert, fans took to social media to express their disappointment. Complaints centered around the high cost of tickets and Mavis Hee not performing her own signature songs. “The concert tickets were expensive and that Mavis Hee did not sing her own hit songs. Instead, she had her band perform them,” wrote one disgruntled fan.
Bizarre Fan Interaction and Allegedly Staged Segments
Adding to the dissatisfaction was a lengthy on-stage fan interaction segment that fans deemed excessive and inauthentic. “Her manager spent almost an hour interacting with fans on stage, talking and chatting. It was mind-boggling. How could there be such a bizarre concert?” another fan expressed their confusion. Netizens further alleged that this supposed “random draw” interaction was entirely staged, with fans simply reading pre-written scripts.
Shortened Performance and Calls for Refunds
Discontentment grew as fans revealed that Mavis Hee only performed for 30 minutes of the entire 2-hour concert. The remaining time was dedicated to the questionable fan interaction segment. This led to some fans demanding refunds, but the manager reportedly dismissed them with a dismissive “Keep dreaming.”
Fans Threaten Complaints and Demand Explanation
Fueled by anger, fans have vowed to file complaints with China’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism, citing a mismatch between the advertised concert content and what was delivered. “We can’t tolerate this kind of performance,” declared a frustrated fan. As of now, neither Mavis Hee nor her manager have addressed the controversy. However, criticism continues to mount on Weibo, with fans urging the singer’s team to acknowledge their concerns and offer a sincere explanation and solution.
Source (1)
Comments